Hi all, I have a 1 year old male Australian Shepherd, and I recently took him to the vet to have a consultation regarding neutering. We met with the vet just to ask questions regarding neutering, but mainly to get to know who would be doing the surgery, so that we could feel confident about it and not have to worry.
Several days prior to his actual neutering appointment day, I called and asked the receptionist to confirm that his appointment was in fact with the vet whom I had seen previously, and that he would be doing the surgery, and after checking her computer, she confirmed positively that he was scheduled with him. This vet also happens to be the senior vet at the clinic, and is the owner of the clinic (at which there are three total veterinarians).
After his surgery, upon arriving home, I was reading over his "physical exam" sheet (notes regarding the surgery), and noticed a different vets name on the paper. This vet is another vet in the office who is younger, and has four years less experience than the vet whom we made the appointment with. She came to the phone and apologized, and after several different explanations that didn't really line up, said she would have the original vet call me.
He did call me the next day, but I missed his call, and he left a voicemail, sounding kind of nervous. He said another client came in and pulled him away to an "urgent matter", and that he "did all of the prep work" but had the other vet do the actual surgery, and "everything went well, and thanks, and bye".
Now, firstly, this particular vet clinic is known as the "best" vet clinic in the area; it has the highest reputation, for whatever reason. Perhaps it is their senior vets and the overall design of the clinic and personnel training; I don't know, but they are the most expensive and generally known as the best. When I found this out, I was in shock. I was pretty pissed off.
Secondly, while I wish I could say he is one of those dogs that has come home and was fine and dandy the same day of the surgery, he hasn't been. It's now the end of day 3, and he is miserable; they put an e-cone on him, and said he has to wear it for a full 10 days, and he hates it. He keeps trying to lick, I assume because it itches, and he can't. I have no way of knowing whether he would be in more or less agony/pain/whatever had the senior vet done the surgery, or not. I just know that it concerns me because everyone else I talk to has this same cheery story of "Oh, yeah, we took Jimbo the Lab home and he was exactly the same on day 1!, no e-cone, no problems at all!", meanwhile, my Aussie is looking at me like "why can't you fix this, this sucks!"
So, I was just wondering, should I raise a big stink about the vet passing my dog off to another vet without my consent, after taking my money for a consultation, etc? How big of an issue is this? Should I/can I sue? Should I/can I ask for a refund? Does the fact that a less experienced vet did the surgery instead factor in? It just seems like if you tell someone you're going to do something, and you take their money, you should do what you say you're going to do; not pass off a patient like a cow. That defeats the entire purpose of a vet clinic being a good vet clinic, doesn't it?
And how worried should I be about doggie man being so miserable? It's tough to tell how much of it is the e-cone, how much of it is internal pain, and how much of it is external (stitches/shaving/skin abrasion/etc). I just can't read his mind, but I know he's not happy. Do some dogs just not do well, or is it rare? Is it more common for the higher intelligence breeds (working dog breeds) to be more sensitive to surgeries and traumas?
Thanks for your thoughts and insights, we really appreciate it.