Joined
·
3 Posts
Ok, I can't decide. 
I've decided. I really want the experience of having a giant breed dog. I've had pointers, poodles, australian shepherds, and find myself without a dog, and the itch is back.
I've decided either a Newfoundland or a St. Bernard.
I'd do rescue/shelter (have with all my other dogs), but I have a 10 month old son, and I really don't want to have to train out undesirable behavior with a small child and I would really like a puppy starting out this time so that there's no question about whether my son is one of the dog's people, etc.
What I really need is some help deciding on whether to get:
1. A St. Bernard from a couple who seems to have great references BUT doesn't OFA certify the puppies' parents... they say, though that "we've had great dogs from this line."
OR
2. A newfoundland from a much larger breeder (they seem like they really do care; not a puppy mill) who OFA certifies their dogs, and I can look at this puppy's bloodlines and see that back 2 generations, they're certified "Good" for hip dysplasia all around in siblings and direct relatives (except for one "Fair" in a grandparent).
Just tying to do my homework as best as I can... yeesh.
Any thoughts from anyone? A saint bernard from a couple who doesn't do the paperwork, but seems awfully sweet and like they're good, honest people or a newfoundland from a larger breeder who's on top of everything when it comes to testing and ensuring they're breeding desireable traits?
I've decided. I really want the experience of having a giant breed dog. I've had pointers, poodles, australian shepherds, and find myself without a dog, and the itch is back.
I'd do rescue/shelter (have with all my other dogs), but I have a 10 month old son, and I really don't want to have to train out undesirable behavior with a small child and I would really like a puppy starting out this time so that there's no question about whether my son is one of the dog's people, etc.
What I really need is some help deciding on whether to get:
1. A St. Bernard from a couple who seems to have great references BUT doesn't OFA certify the puppies' parents... they say, though that "we've had great dogs from this line."
OR
2. A newfoundland from a much larger breeder (they seem like they really do care; not a puppy mill) who OFA certifies their dogs, and I can look at this puppy's bloodlines and see that back 2 generations, they're certified "Good" for hip dysplasia all around in siblings and direct relatives (except for one "Fair" in a grandparent).
Just tying to do my homework as best as I can... yeesh.
Any thoughts from anyone? A saint bernard from a couple who doesn't do the paperwork, but seems awfully sweet and like they're good, honest people or a newfoundland from a larger breeder who's on top of everything when it comes to testing and ensuring they're breeding desireable traits?