[upendi'smommy]

So I was reading through a PetMD article on the best dog breeds for children and I came across things like this.
"The Bull Dog (not to be confused with the aggressive “Pitt Bull”"
"Unfairly compared to the Pitt Pull at times"
Now there are probably out there who treat there world like religion when it comes to pet, so you think they'd try to help and do they're part to show people that it's not the breed, it's the owner. But instead, it seems that they'd rather re-enforce what most people think as it is. That pitbulls are vicious horrible dogs, even though it's simply not the case.

 

[BobSD]

Actually it is amazing the idiots that qualify themselves to write any article with out ture knowlege of the subject content. I feel PB and bull dogs are closely related, there lies the problem one dog with another dog, there is no issue with children and a PB family dog! They have been proven to be the most devoted family dog. If the writer was within range I would kick'm in the a$$. Unless it were a female would not I think?

 

[upendi'smommy]

That was kind of my point. The person writing the article is 'qualified', but clearly biased against PB's which are great family dogs. Just because they can be da doesn't mean they'll be agressive with people.