Personally, I don't care about breed registries. I think closed registries are actually a huge contributor to the health problems we see in dogs. That said, crossing a couple of purebreds or purebred-crosses of different breeds willy-nilly is no improvement, and in many cases is worse, because then you also lose the upside of discrete breeds, which is standardization and predictability. Those cutesy portmanteaus have all the downsides of purebreds without the upside...
I'd like to see more dedicated, skillful, informed breeders getting back to breeding for types rather than breeding per a registry's requirements. That's how breeds developed in the first place, after all. IMO a landrace approach produces a much higher rate of animals that are sound in mind and body and can do a job. (I would consider "companion" a possible job, too.) Alaskan huskies are a modern example of a dog "type" rather than a breed that's still highly recognizable, is sound in mind and body, and serves a purpose. I'd love to see more people working, without regard for breed but with great regard for bloodlines, to produce, say, the best and healthiest possible waterfowl retriever or the best and healthiest possible hypoallergenic snuggly lap dog...
Hi everyone.
I currently have a German Shepherd/Golden Retriever mix. I also have a Full blooded German Shepherd Dog. I am really considering breeding them one time. Then getting them fixed.
I know what breeding entails. I am just worried if there will be any interest in my puppies.
I paid $400 for the mom (mixed) and she has the most amazing temperament, same with the dad.
I just don’t want to breed them and be stuck with puppies.
I would post on Facebook about interest but I know so many people would jump down my throat about shelter dogs.
It's not about whether the two of them are both nice dogs. It's about whether the two of them would produce puppies that are as good or better than they are. Two nice dogs would not necessarily complement one another when crossed - you want a bitch and a dog that shore up one another's (very minor) weaker points and reinforce their (very powerful) strong points.
Even at that, unless there's something you haven't shared (like they're both great pro tracking dogs or obedience champs and thus there'd be lively interest in the litter despite being mixed breed), you'll lose money this litter if you breed responsibly. GSDs and Goldens both are rife with heritable diseases, disorders and structural issues, most of which are hidden when the dog is young, but that they can still pass on to offspring. At bare minimum you need to have hips, elbows, eyes, and heart screened by professional evaluators (not just a regular vet wellness check) before you breed. You should also screen for thyroid issues and degenerative myelopathy, which can rear ugly heads later in life even if you don't see signs now. (Plus, you need to dig into their family histories looking for things like cancers and other longevity-killers, particularly in the Golden cross.) Add in the prenatal care and puppy care, and at a few hundred bucks per pup, you're not even going to come close to recouping your costs even if the dogs pass the screenings. And that's if you DON'T have any pregnancy or puppy emergencies that run up your expenses even more...
There's no shortage of nice Goldens and nice GSDs out there - if you're want a pup related to these animals, why not look back in their family trees and find someone who's breeding a sibling or cousin to your dogs? It'd be a lot simpler and less risky than DIY dog production.