Frankly, I think it's a little silly (and buying a little much into the overpopulation presumed-conclusion) to even debate whether breeding is ethical. To make the assumption that intentional breeding is NOT ethical is to assume that companion animals should die out- because the only ones produced would be from shelters or rescue, which are automatically not breeding candidates since any responsible shelter or rescue alters their dogs.
If we want healthy, sound, drivey (purebred or strainbred) dogs to be available in 10 years, responsible breeders need to be breeding them now.
I have heard people say "Well, if everyone just STOPPED for a year/5 yeras/10 years, we could get on top of the shelter population." And the thing is, I just don't see where they're figuring that. First, that assumes that everyone who was breeding intentional litters would obey the law. (Just like they obey their local licensing and sales tax laws? HAH.) Secondly, this depends on the assumption that people who are going to get a dog will take pretty much any dog, and that any dog can fit into pretty much any situation with a small amount of work. And that just plain isn't true. All dogs aren't created equal, and the demand for small to medium sized dogs who are relatively easy to live with FAR outstrips shelter supply, even if vet care, transportation and training were increased to allow dogs who are currently unadoptable due to medical conditions (such as mange, HBC, luxating patellas- all maojr expenses to treat and must be done beofre placement, so they also tie up a kennel run), temperament problems, or location (for example, it's relatively easy to find a chihuahua in a shelter here in TX if you're not picky about behavior, but the same dog would get snapped up in a shelter in NYC.) And some types of dogs- notably pit bulls- have a surplus pretty much wherever you are. So people are still going to want to get dogs, and they're not necessarily going to be able to find (or want naything) that is available from their local shelters. It'll result in underground puppy sales and imports from Mexico and Canada.
A dog generation is basically 10 years. Bitches can't generally be bred safely any older than 8 (and that's pushing it as an average- most breeders won't breed a girl past 7) and dogs generally are not fertile much past 10 or 11. You can save semen, but there's no replacement for those bitches whose entire reproductive career would be missed. ANd suddenly, you have entire breeds where the ENTIRE population that is still intact is those belonging to people who broke the law- the ones who stayed underground, who didn't health test or show or make themselves visible in any way. Is that REALLY who you want controlling the future of dogs?
I got my first dog from a breeder because I could not find the dog I wanted in rescue. I had a specific size range, I wanted a certain personality, and it was plain not available in rescue. The breed rescue for that particular breed gets approximately 100 dogs per year across the entire US, and if you want a young, sound dog (ie, for agility competition), you can literally wait YEARS. Then I got interested in showing. And it just grew from there. My life revolved around DOING stuff with my dogs. I grew up and moved on to another breed, where it was very difficult to find people who were balancing health, temperament, and breed type in a way I was satisfied with. If I wanted the exact blend of priorities that *I* felt were the correct way, I was going to need to do that myself. And that's where I am right now. Drive, health, temperament, all in a typey body- a dog who looks AND acts the way the breed is supposed to, with the drive and soundness to WORK for a living as a sports dog or a service dog, as well as being beautiful- but if I have to sacrifice something, it's going to be the finer points of looks as compared to the breed stnadard- nothing else.
If we want healthy, sound, drivey (purebred or strainbred) dogs to be available in 10 years, responsible breeders need to be breeding them now.
I have heard people say "Well, if everyone just STOPPED for a year/5 yeras/10 years, we could get on top of the shelter population." And the thing is, I just don't see where they're figuring that. First, that assumes that everyone who was breeding intentional litters would obey the law. (Just like they obey their local licensing and sales tax laws? HAH.) Secondly, this depends on the assumption that people who are going to get a dog will take pretty much any dog, and that any dog can fit into pretty much any situation with a small amount of work. And that just plain isn't true. All dogs aren't created equal, and the demand for small to medium sized dogs who are relatively easy to live with FAR outstrips shelter supply, even if vet care, transportation and training were increased to allow dogs who are currently unadoptable due to medical conditions (such as mange, HBC, luxating patellas- all maojr expenses to treat and must be done beofre placement, so they also tie up a kennel run), temperament problems, or location (for example, it's relatively easy to find a chihuahua in a shelter here in TX if you're not picky about behavior, but the same dog would get snapped up in a shelter in NYC.) And some types of dogs- notably pit bulls- have a surplus pretty much wherever you are. So people are still going to want to get dogs, and they're not necessarily going to be able to find (or want naything) that is available from their local shelters. It'll result in underground puppy sales and imports from Mexico and Canada.
A dog generation is basically 10 years. Bitches can't generally be bred safely any older than 8 (and that's pushing it as an average- most breeders won't breed a girl past 7) and dogs generally are not fertile much past 10 or 11. You can save semen, but there's no replacement for those bitches whose entire reproductive career would be missed. ANd suddenly, you have entire breeds where the ENTIRE population that is still intact is those belonging to people who broke the law- the ones who stayed underground, who didn't health test or show or make themselves visible in any way. Is that REALLY who you want controlling the future of dogs?
I got my first dog from a breeder because I could not find the dog I wanted in rescue. I had a specific size range, I wanted a certain personality, and it was plain not available in rescue. The breed rescue for that particular breed gets approximately 100 dogs per year across the entire US, and if you want a young, sound dog (ie, for agility competition), you can literally wait YEARS. Then I got interested in showing. And it just grew from there. My life revolved around DOING stuff with my dogs. I grew up and moved on to another breed, where it was very difficult to find people who were balancing health, temperament, and breed type in a way I was satisfied with. If I wanted the exact blend of priorities that *I* felt were the correct way, I was going to need to do that myself. And that's where I am right now. Drive, health, temperament, all in a typey body- a dog who looks AND acts the way the breed is supposed to, with the drive and soundness to WORK for a living as a sports dog or a service dog, as well as being beautiful- but if I have to sacrifice something, it's going to be the finer points of looks as compared to the breed stnadard- nothing else.