Joined
·
5,442 Posts
If ignorance were nickles, this guy would be a millionare.
http://petslifemagazine.ca/petslife-interview-with-dog-trainer-brad-pattison/
http://petslifemagazine.ca/petslife-interview-with-dog-trainer-brad-pattison/
Actually, dogs are far more likely to be injured at home, eating something like cooked chicken bones or chocolate.I took all the constructive critisism and compliments and developed the Street Safety Training Course. Taking the lessons often taught in classrooms, out to the street where you find the most distractions, and where dogs seem to be injured the most.
Dr. Dunbar must be coughing up his skull at being referenced by Pattison.This comes from experience, testing, watching and understanding the behavior of dogs/coyotes/wolves and the packs, and other industry experts and professionals including Dr. Ian Dunbar.
Ahem. Nice Messiah Complex there, buddy, but the fact of the matter is, it's not the clicker that saves dogs, it's the owner's use of the clicker and commitment to training and management. No training method works if you don't use it.PL: What led you to creating your own training certification?
BP: Because no other method was working. No other method was preventing dogs from being euthanized for bad behavior.
This is what Pattison does. That is a two handed leash check. That's not humane by any stretch of that word.PL: How would you describe your training method?
BP: I’m not really into titles, but I have been told by Pet Industry Professionals that it is the most Humane. I allow dogs to be dogs. Not running the risk of obesity, not jumping up, and not running away. I am not designing new bad behaviors, just eliminating them and creating good, well mannered, thinking dogs.
Clicker training has decades of science behind it. It has been used to train killer whales, dolphins, bears and many other animals. It's simple operant conditioning.PL: What about the other training methods did you disagree with?
BP: I feel that the other methods are using words and rewards to train a dog which is not languages that the dog actually understands.
Right, because dogs can't understand sounds. That's why they growl and bark at each other and whine and howl. That's why their vocal "vocabulary" is sound. A word is a sequence of sounds (hence: phonics).PL: What about the other training methods did you disagree with?
BP: I feel that the other methods are using words and rewards to train a dog which is not languages that the dog actually understands.
The lady that told him the above did not lie, how many times have I said it's the dog not the breed. Only thing is at my age I'll bet I said it before she did.One thing she taught me was to never look at a dog as a breed. Golden Retrievers, Chihuaha’s, Great Danes, are all the same breed, but every dog within that breed has different needs. There isn’t a way to train Goldens, or a way to train Labs, each dog is different.
:crazy:Right, because dogs can't understand sounds. That's why they growl and bark at each other and whine and howl. That's why their vocal "vocabulary" is sound. A word is a sequence of sounds (hence: phonics).
Me saying "get the ball!" is the same as him barking at me because the timer went off. They are both communicating an event with an expected behavior (me: I want him to get the ball, him: he wants me to go where the timer beeps are coming from)
Dominance theory is thoroughly debunked. Your dog accepts it because he's tolerant to handling, or because you're petting him and he doesn't care as long as he gets pets. Dominance isn't in it.I do agree with dominance as a whole to a degree though. Although I don't flip my dogs and would never sugest it. All I do is if he's on the floor I put myself over him in the air, or if I'm petting him I might. I never force him, but he seems to understand and accept that I'm dominant.
I'm so sorry!!!! Hope you are recovered now.I only got to the part where he said he thinks it's wrong when people think bullying is ok, because then I laughed so hard I choked on my own spit and fainted.
Love thisI only got to the part where he said he thinks it's wrong when people think bullying is ok, because then I laughed so hard I choked on my own spit and fainted.
One of our readers put the challenge out for you to define the following terms: operant conditioning, +CER, DRI, Counter-conditioning, threshold distance, desensitizing, LAT, CTT, ABI, ritualized vs. n0n-ritualized conflict resolution between dogs, aversives, what is a calming signal and why do dogs use them.
BP: I think it is ignorant when people over talk to their clients. “Your dog has OCD, territorial aggression, Possessive aggression with maternal aggression.” That’s great. But you didn’t give the client any information.
I hate it when my vet tries to say things like "urinary incontinence" and "hip dysplasia." Its "wee-wee tinkles" and "the ar-thuh-ritises", DUHif I sit down, walk through and explain each to a client, rather than saying the fancy terms, its different.
Right, because by the time I seek out a behaviorist (if thats even what we can call you) I'm most concerned about customer service, and not the results you get with my dog.It is friendlier and more understanding. My CTE’s then take more time with their clients, are not rushed, and that is part of our Customer Service.
[/QUOTE]All of those terms are straight from the Treat Training Industry Vocabulary. We don’t use them anyway! They are all clinical based. I get concerned when I hear trainers throwing these terms around.
OOOH, that scary treat training industry. those bastards. and clinical? all i hear is cyni-cal *bah dum psshht*I hate it when my vet tries to say things like "urinary incontinence" and "hip dysplasia." Its "wee-wee tinkles" and "the ar-thuh-ritises", DUH
Right, because by the time I seek out a behaviorist (if thats even what we can call you) I'm most concerned about customer service, and not the results you get with my dog.